Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Education in China

ISSN 1673-341X

ISSN 1673-3533(Online)

CN 11-5741/G4

Postal Subscription Code 80-979

Front. Educ. China    2017, Vol. 12 Issue (4) : 445-467    https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11516-017-0033-2
Research article
Policy and Practice of the Decentralization of Basic Education in China: The Shanghai Case
Xiang QI()
Department of Public Administration, Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
 Download: PDF(1868 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This paper is aimed at exploring distinctive features of the decentralization of basic education in Shanghai by drawing on data from Shanghai Program for International Students Assessment (PISA) 2012. While doing the research for this paper, the author found that from a policy perspective, Shanghai had launched a reform policy aimed at transforming the highly centralized education system. This included a devolution of the decision-making authority to local departments of education and a reduction of control over schools. Private school policies were also initiated with the understanding that private schools ought to enjoy autonomy in almost every aspect of decision-making. From the perspective of practice, decentralization of basic education could be categorized as county-based school decentralization. In such a situation, the county bureaus of education wielded decision-making authority over a number of areas in the public school sector, while gradually devolving some decision-making authority to the public schools themselves; and the private schools enjoyed autonomy within their major decision-making areas. Given both the policy and practice of the decentralization of basic education in Shanghai, some suggestions are provided regarding: (1) how to promote school decentralization, and (2) how to balance it with accountability.

Keywords basic education      decentralization      policy      practice     
Issue Date: 09 February 2018
 Cite this article:   
Xiang QI. Policy and Practice of the Decentralization of Basic Education in China: The Shanghai Case[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2017, 12(4): 445-467.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fed/EN/10. 1007/s11516-017-0033-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fed/EN/Y2017/V12/I4/445
[1] JIN Li, Rebecca CLOTHEY, Brian MCCOMMONS. Implementing Effective Internships: A Case Study of Work-Integrated Learning in a Chinese Undergraduate University[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2020, 15(3): 482-504.
[2] LIU Xu. How Government Policy Is Implemented in the Private University: A Case Study from China[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2018, 13(3): 426-447.
[3] HUANG Hua. The Promise and Dilemma of the Mediated Parent-Teacher Relationship in the Age of Social Networking Sites[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2017, 12(4): 468-489.
[4] Qian YANG. Intercultural Communication in the Context of a Canada?China Sister School Partnership: The Experience of One New Basic Education School[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2017, 12(2): 200-218.
[5] Gang ZHU. “The Monkey King Meets the Spiderman”: Narrative Inquiry into Chinese Students’ Academic Socialization Experiences in a U.S. University[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2017, 12(1): 98-119.
[6] Creso SÁ,Julieta GRIECO. International Collaboration in Brazilian Higher Education[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2015, 10(1): 7-22.
[7] Qingmin SHI. Relationship Between Teacher Efficacy and Self-Reported Instructional Practices: An Examination of Five Asian Countries/Regions Using TIMSS 2011 Data[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2014, 9(4): 577-602.
[8] Su GAO. Relationship between Science Teaching Practices and Students’ Achievement in Singapore, Chinese Taipei, and the US: An Analysis Using TIMSS 2011 Data[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2014, 9(4): 519-551.
[9] Qiang CHENG. Quality Mathematics Instructional Practices Contributing to Student Achievements in Five High-Achieving Asian Education Systems: An Analysis Using TIMSS 2011 Data[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2014, 9(4): 493-518.
[10] Michael SINGH,Jinghe HAN. Educating Teachers of “Chinese as a Local/Global Language”: Teaching “Chinese with Australian Characteristics”[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2014, 9(3): 403-428.
[11] XING Xin,Fred DERVIN. Dancing in Fetters? Chinese Principals’ Perceptions of the Effects of Finnish Training Programs[J]. Front. Educ. China, 2014, 9(2): 211-237.
[12] YIN Hongbiao. Implementing the National Curriculum Reform In China: A Review of the Decade[J]. Front Educ Chin, 2013, 8(3): 331-359.
[13] Jun LI. The Chinese Model of Teacher Education: Retrospects and Prospects over a Century[J]. Front Educ Chin, 2012, 7(3): 417-442.
[14] Doris Pui-Wah CHENG. The Relation between Early Childhood Teachers’ Conceptualization of “Play” and Their Practice: Implication for the Process of Learning to Teach[J]. Front Educ Chin, 2012, 7(1): 65-84.
[15] Almina PARDHAN. Pakistani Teachers’ Perceptions of Kindergarten Children’s Learning: An Exploration of Understanding and Practice[J]. Front Educ Chin, 2012, 7(1): 33-64.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed